Cinematic decks on your brand, tuned to your buyer.

Yes — Beautiful.ai is a strong template and auto-formatting engine. It solves a real problem (formatting drudgery) very well. Lurio solves a different problem: making sure what you draft is also on-brand, internally consistent, and reviewed by experts before it ships.

Not directly today. Most teams rebuild key client decks in Lurio from the source material — usually a fast process because Lurio drafts the first version from your website and brief. Improved import is on the roadmap.

Yes — Lurio handles layout, type, and visual rhythm automatically. The difference is what comes after: Lurio also critiques what was formatted. Beautiful.ai stops at the design step.

Five experts review every slide. Strategy Critic checks argument structure. Narrative Reviewer checks story arc and transitions. Data Integrity checks numbers reconcile across slides and against sources. Brand Compliance checks visual consistency. Audience Fit checks the framing matches the buyer. Every flag cites the source it came from.

Lurio is Pro $15 per user per month or Intelligence $29 per user per month, with a free forever tier. Beautiful.ai's paid tiers are in a similar range. The cost-per-defended-proposal is what matters: catching one off-brand or mis-stated proposal a year pays for either subscription many times over.

Yes. Founders, sales teams, board reporting, and internal updates all benefit from the brand and critique layer. The agency wedge is where the workflow value compounds fastest because output volume is highest.

Yes. Every proposal carries an audit trail — who drafted it, which experts flagged what, what changed in response, and who signed it off. Partners approve, not rewrite.

Upload past-winning proposals, methodology decks, and case studies. A custom expert is trained on that knowledge and critiques new work against it. Junior drafts come back sounding like a partner wrote them.