Investor-grade decks tuned to your buyer.

No. Tome is a generative storytelling tool — prompt to a narrative-led slide deck. Lurio is a creation and critique platform for agencies — drafts on your brand and runs every slide past five AI experts trained on your firm's knowledge before you send to a client.

You can — but Tome isn't optimised for it. There's no AI review layer, no custom experts on your firm's knowledge, no audit trail, and brand fidelity depends on manual styling. For agencies, the gap is the review layer.

Five experts run on every deck automatically: Strategy Critic, Narrative Reviewer, Data Integrity, Brand Compliance, Audience Fit. Each cites the source it grounded its flag in — your past-winning proposals, methodology, or the deck itself. You can also build custom experts per client or service line.

Lurio's defaults are cleaner and more business-appropriate than Tome's evocative aesthetic. Every slide is on your brand, animated cinematically. If you need narrative essay-style decks, Tome's defaults are more striking; for client proposals, Lurio's are more defensible.

Not directly today. Rebuild in Lurio from the source material — usually fast because Lurio drafts the first version from your website. Improved import is on the roadmap.

Lurio is Free forever, Pro $15 per user per month, Intelligence $29 per user per month. Tome's paid tiers are in a similar range. Pricing isn't the deciding factor — the question is whether you need the review layer.

Yes — Lurio handles any deck type. Tome's defaults are slightly more aesthetic for narrative-first content. For high-stakes client work, Lurio's structured review and brand enforcement matter more than the storytelling vibe.

If you ship one client proposal a week and a partner currently reviews every page line by line at night, yes — the experts catch the same things partners catch, with citations, before the partner sees the deck. Partners approve instead of rewrite.